Jane Eyre

1997

Drama / Romance

3
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Certified Fresh 67%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 67% · 1K ratings
IMDb Rating 7.0/10 10 3301 3.3K

Plot summary

Charlotte Bronte's classic novel is filmed yet again. The story of the Yorkshire orphan who becomes a governess to a young French girl and finds love with the brooding lord of the manor is given a standard romantic flare, but sparks do not seem to happen between the two leads in this version.


Uploaded by: FREEMAN
August 30, 2022 at 11:59 PM

Director

Top cast

Samantha Morton as Jane Eyre
Ciarán Hinds as Edward Rochester
Rupert Penry-Jones as St. John Rivers
Joanna Scanlan as Bessie
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
989.35 MB
1280*720
English 2.0
NR
25 fps
1 hr 47 min
Seeds ...
1.79 GB
1920*1080
English 2.0
NR
25 fps
1 hr 47 min
Seeds 2

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by cyanidebaby 8 / 10

Easy Watching, they miss a load from the book though....

This 'Jane Eyre' on the whole is quite a good adaptation for those who do not fuss if a few chapters are missed out. Samantha Morton's sweet voice is perfect for innocent Jane, yet she is slightly to pretty for her in my opinion. Her acting is on the whole is great though the kiss scene with Rochester should be avoided when you have just eaten because some might find it a put off to see to people literally chomping on each other's faces.

Hinds gives quite a strong performance until the last hour or so, the only problem I have with him is that when he is unsure of how to deliver a line he just shouts it.

Overall I think it is relaxed viewing for those who have not read the novel and it is quite a charming version...

Reviewed by linken 6 / 10

What a come-down from the earlier versions!!!

The only thing that really recommends this movie is the scenery--it was beautifully filmed. However, the hammy acting and seemingly constant yelling of Ciarán Hinds & Samantha Morton spoil much of the beauty of the story. One of the things that attracted Mr. Rochester to Jane Eyre was her serenity. I saw none of that restful quality in this performance. This being one of my all-time favourite novels, I do enjoy watching all versions but I must admit this one was a disappointment. The British versions of the classics are usually better.

Reviewed by daria84 9 / 10

Chopped parts but very true to the book

I'll start by saying this was the first version I've ever seen, and after watching it, I decided to read the book (not the other way around).

When I first watched it, I really had no idea what the story was about so I wasn't on my guard, and some scenes really stroke me in an emotional level I didn't believe it when I first started watching it. Samantha Morton as Jane was very convincing, not a beauty, not ugly, then I found out that was how Brontë described her in the book. Jane was well mannered, sweet and tender, but with iron will and fire in her soul, it was a perfect combination of a heroin in the book who had to endure a lot of things during her life.

As for Mr. Rochester, well I'm a big CIaran Hinds so I may not be completely objective in reviewing his acting, but for me, he was PERFECT. Yes he yelled, he was too proud, sarcastic, but his raw passion and angst was right there you feel it, and specially in the parts where he seemed to touch heaven, and the other part where hell was right before him (those who read the book or watched the movie will know what parts those are).

The chemistry between Morton and Hinds is amazing, when they are talking under the tree, I really began to cry and felt overwhelmed by the intense emotion flooding my screen, and then in the same tree after the "event", I cried some more because I could feel the despair from Rochester and Jane's sorrow but determination. And finally, in the end, I cried more and more with the strong performance from the two of them.

I read the book afterwards, and yes many scenes are left out (gipsy, Jane's aunt dying, Jane's dreams, the tale of Bertha Mason, Jane's new found fortune, etc...) but considering they had only 1 hour 40 minutes to consolidate an 800 pages book, I believed they did a pretty good job.

I read some comments about people who disliked Hinds performance as Rochester, saying he screams too much, well personally I didn't think he "screamed", he raised his voice and Rochester does that a lot in the book. I watched another version with Michael Fassbender, and it lacked the passion this Rochester has, it actually made me yawn.

I highly recommend this version, the casting is great, overall the movie is very true to the book, and the strong performances given by Morton as Jane, and Hinds as Rochester, is really something not to be missed. If you imagined Mr. Rochester as a handsome, well mannered, with integrity, soft spoken and tender man (in other words, a Jane Austen hero, I can't imagine why somebody would imagine him like that), you will hate Hind's Rochester, but if you imagined as a non-attractive man in a conventional way, sarcastic, snappish, moody, witty, intense, rough, tough, passionate, angry but tender when he must and overall, a tortured soul who finds redemption through pure love, you will not be disappointed with him.

Read more IMDb reviews

1 Comment

Be the first to leave a comment