New Rose Hotel

1998

Action / Drama / Mystery / Sci-Fi / Thriller

13
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 24% · 17 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 38% · 1K ratings
IMDb Rating 5.1/10 10 6255 6.3K

Plot summary

A corporate raider and his henchman use a chanteuse to lure a scientific genius away from his employer and family.


Uploaded by: FREEMAN
August 02, 2021 at 11:24 PM

Director

Top cast

Annabella Sciorra as Madame Rosa
Gretchen Mol as Hiroshi's Wife
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
854.09 MB
1280*720
English 2.0
R
23.976 fps
1 hr 33 min
Seeds 6
1.71 GB
1904*1072
English 5.1
R
23.976 fps
1 hr 33 min
Seeds 12

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by VisionThing 4 / 10

Grotesque limping

With a solid plot basis (William Gibson short story), two excellent actors (Christopher Walken, Willem Dafoe) and an interesting director (Abel Ferrara) this movie could have well turned out to be a real hidden gem. Dario Argento's daughter posing as the female lead doesn't have any other qualification for her role than an Italian accent and a nice body -- no screen presence, no femme fatale charisma, no "edge" -- and the budget has obviously been someone's lunch money for a week, but those things alone would not have done too much damage. However, there are some bigger issues with this film.

In the beginning of the movie there's way too much singing in the bars, and it's all bad. I've been to karaoke bars where the performers have been significantly more talented. All of them. No kidding. And near the end the movie falls apart, mainly thanks to way too many flashbacks -- they are not of just one or two key scenes, but of umpteen, in a peculiar "here's the movie again in case you missed it" fashion. They are annoying as such, and as a result you probably lose your focus and, consequently, your grasp of the plot. What you end up having instead of a real movie is a 90 minutes long artsy collection of insubstantial sleazy moving pictures with nudity.

In short, the first half of the movie does not get your hopes up too high, yet the latter half is disappointing. Kind of an achievement, I suppose. For better or worse, Walken's cool charisma and Argento's numerous nude scenes may still keep you awake through the whole thing. 4/10

Reviewed by ShimmySnail 8 / 10

good if you like William Gibson or Abel Ferrara

I think this movie got a bum rap. I actually enjoyed it much more than that travesty Johnny Mnemonic (my apologies to Gibson, I know he liked it). Note to Hollywood, Ice-T does not go good with everything, and the deranged preacher bit has been overdone. But here I think Abel Ferrara really made a world in line with what I envisioned when reading the short story, any of Gibson's short stories. It's not a future where everything is blinking lights and super speed CGI, it's a future where most people live in the slums, and the rest have a clean, aerodynamic, one-button-for-everything lifestyle.

The premise, a couple of corporate "headhunters" trying to seduce a brilliant researcher away from a billion dollar multinational with a geisha type mole, is the kind of premise that Gibson is famous for. It's a single incident revolving around human emotions but having worldwide implications because the man is so brilliant he could change the course of science.

The acting is great of course: Willem Dafoe, Christopher Walken, and an early glimpse of Asia Argento. The story doesn't hit you over the head explaining events like most films, but Ferrara never does, and half the fun is suddenly realizing what's happened, the check mate, on your own.

If you want action, go see Johnny Mnemonic, if you want deep, see this film.

Reviewed by FiendishDramaturgy 1 / 10

Unsalvagable Detritus

Corporate raiders use any trick conceivable to lure a genius into their fold...oh, and to win.

This was a rambling and unfocused tale with some mildly interesting plot elements, which suffer completely convoluted execution. Other than some nice camera angles and lighting details, there is nothing at all to redeem this work.

Not even Christopher Walken's wonderful performance could save this flop. Willem Dafoe comes close, but no cigar. I suppose it may be worth watching for their performances, but you surely have to be a connoisseur to derive a moment's pleasure, even from that. OH, they're good, don't get me wrong, but the screenplay is horrid. Simply horrid.

All in all? Don't bother.

It rates a 0.7/10 from...

the Fiend :.

Read more IMDb reviews

3 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment